Comments Posted By Chris Cwenske@ku.edu
Displaying 1 To 1 Of 1 Comments
ANTHRAX SUICIDE CASE RAISES TROUBLING QUESTIONS
your source is from a baltimore paper written by an la times writer. this source isn't even posted on the la times web site. there are no sources in the original story. where are your sources for your claims. you are using a source with none itself. your rational is flawed. where did information come from in the original story. your logic is so flawed,
"Why did the FBI concentrate their investigation instead on Stephen Hatfill, recipient of more than $5 million in a settlement agreed to just a few months ago and another employee at the lab? While demonstrating a breathtaking incompetence,this fact alone absolves the government of any conspiracy in my mind for the simple fact it would be stupid to make someone from the same lab as Ivins a suspect if there was a plot afoot. There are other labs they could have grabbed a patsy from while deflecting attention from Ivins. Therefore, we can almost certainly conclude that the FBI would not be part of any plot."
I mean what?! Where are the credible sources for your post and the writer whose story you used without citing?
Comment Posted By Chris Cwenske@ku.edu On 8.08.2008 @ 03:12
